CONSOL Energy Inc (NYSE:CNX). (NYSE: CEIX) reported a robust first quarter in 2024, with a net income of $102 million and adjusted EBITDA of $182 million, despite facing operational hurdles such as longwall moves and the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge.
The Pennsylvania Mining Complex (PAMC) produced 6.5 million tons of coal, with the company successfully increasing its export market presence, which accounted for 65% of its Q1 revenues. Still, the bridge collapse did impact their export capabilities, leading to a revised production guidance for the PAMC to 24-26 million tons and an increased PMC average cash cost of coal sold to $37.50-$39.50 per ton.
The company maintains strong liquidity with a net cash position of $65 million and total liquidity of $478 million, and remains committed to returning value to shareholders through share repurchases.
Key Takeaways
- CONSOL Energy (NYSE:CEIX)'s operational performance remained strong with a net income of $102 million.
- 65% of Q1 2024 revenues were generated from the export market.
- The collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge and longwall moves posed challenges, leading to a revised production guidance.
- The company reported a net cash position of $65 million, with total liquidity at $478 million.
- CONSOL Energy plans to make up for lost tonnage due to the Baltimore Port closure by the end of May.
- Share buybacks continue, with 89% of Q1 free cash flow used for repurchasing common stock.
Company Outlook
- CONSOL Energy aims to increase coal sales in the export market.
- Negotiations are underway for long-term fixed-price deals with domestic utilities.
- Adjustments to production guidance and cost of coal sold due to operational challenges.
Bearish Highlights
- Free cash flow negatively impacted by approximately $81 million due to working capital changes.
- The Baltimore Port closure prevented the shipment of around 450,000 tons of coal.
- Equipment delivery delays and reduced manpower affected the Itmann Mining Complex.
Bullish Highlights
- Strong liquidity and financial flexibility through debt repayment and increased cash.
- The company has a solid contract book for 2024 and 2025 with fixed and variable pricing volume commitments.
- Strong demand for coal in export industrial markets and revenue visibility from long-term contracts.
Misses
- PMC production guidance reduced due to the bridge collapse.
- PMC average cash cost of coal sold guidance increased.
- Suspension of average cash cost of coal sold per ton guidance for the Itmann Mining Complex.
Q&A Highlights
- Bob Braithwaite noted expectations of strong demand in Q3 due to a projected strong summer burn.
- Jimmy Brock expressed concerns regarding the Clean Power Plan, anticipating potential litigation and long-term impact on the power supply.
CONSOL Energy's first quarter of 2024 showcased its ability to navigate through significant obstacles while maintaining a focus on its financial health and shareholder value. The company's strategic moves to mitigate the impacts of unforeseen events like the bridge collapse and port closures, while continuing to secure and fulfill contracts, demonstrate its resilience and adaptability in a dynamic market.
As CONSOL Energy looks to the future, it remains poised to capitalize on the strong demand for coal, particularly in the export market, while also addressing the challenges at the Itmann Mining Complex. The company's proactive approach to managing its operations and finances bodes well for its performance in the upcoming quarters.
InvestingPro Insights
CONSOL Energy Inc. (CEIX) has weathered operational challenges and remains a formidable player in the coal industry, as evidenced by its strong financials and strategic initiatives. Here are some insights based on real-time data from InvestingPro that further illustrate the company's position:
InvestingPro Data:
- The company boasts a robust Market Cap of approximately $2.56 billion USD.
- An attractive P/E Ratio of 4.41 demonstrates the company's earnings relative to its share price.
- Revenue for the last twelve months as of Q4 2023 stands at $2.527 billion USD, indicating a healthy growth of 10.09%.
InvestingPro Tips:
- Management's aggressive share buyback strategy is a strong signal of confidence in the company's value and future prospects.
- With more cash than debt on its balance sheet, CONSOL Energy exhibits financial stability and readiness for future investments or to weather economic downturns.
These insights, coupled with the fact that CONSOL Energy holds a strong liquidity position and has a solid contract book for the upcoming years, suggest that the company is well-equipped to continue its trajectory of growth and profitability.
For investors looking for more in-depth analysis, there are additional InvestingPro Tips available at https://www.investing.com/pro/CEIX, including predictions of profitability for this year and a high return over the last decade. Unlock the full potential of these insights with a special offer – use coupon code PRONEWS24 to get an additional 10% off a yearly or biyearly Pro and Pro+ subscription.
Full transcript - Consol Energy Inc (CEIX) Q1 2024:
Operator: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. And welcome to the CIEX First Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all lines are in the listen-only mode. Following the presentation, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] This call is being recorded on Tuesday, May 7, 2024. I would now like to turn the conference over to Nathan Tucker, Director of Finance and Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Nathan Tucker: Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Welcome to CONSOL Energy’s first quarter 2024 earnings conference call. Any forward-looking statements or comments we make about future events are subject to risk, certain of which we have outlined in our press release and in our SEC filing, and are considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We do not undertake any obligations of updating any forward-looking statements for future events or otherwise. We will also be discussing certain non-GAAP financial measures, which are defined and reconciled to comparable GAAP financial measures, in our 2024 First Quarter press release, furnished to the SEC on Form 8-K, which is also posted on our website. Additionally, we filed our 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2024, with the SEC this morning. You can find additional information regarding the company on our website, www.consolenergy.com, which also includes a supplemental slide deck that was posted this morning. On the call with me today are Jimmy Brock, our Chief Executive Officer; Mitesh Thakkar, our President and Chief Financial Officer; and Bob Braithwaite, our Senior Vice President of Marketing and Sales. In his prepared remarks, Jimmy will provide a recap of our first quarter achievements and a detailed discussion of our operations. Mitesh will then provide an update on our marketing and financial progress and our updated 2024 guidance. In his closing comments, Jimmy will recap our capital allocation progress and lay out our key priorities for the remainder of the year. There will be a Q&A session followed by the prepared remarks in which Bob will also participate. With that, let me turn it over to Jimmy.
Jimmy Brock: Thank you, Nate. Good morning, everyone. CONSOL Energy finished the first quarter with a strong operational performance and produced 6.5 million tons from the Pennsylvania Mining Complex, which was no small feat considering each of the three mines had a longwall move in the quarter. We are very proud of the PAMC team for their efforts during these moves and for completing them safely and efficiently. We continued our export shift and 65% of our Q1 2024 total reoccurring revenues and other income was derived from sales into the export market. We also continued to execute our strategy of returning value to our shareholders through share buybacks and deployed 89% of our Q1 2024 free cash flow toward retiring 440,000 shares of our common stock. Before I move to the operational update, let me address the situation at our CONSOL Marine Terminal where vessel access to our terminal became blocked due to the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore in late March. We’d like to again extend our condolences to all of those affected by this tragedy. This event has limited our ability to ship coal into the export market and per multiple agency officials, this restriction is expected to continue through the end of May. However, we have successfully developed alternative strategies to partially offset the impact. First, we’ve identified and worked with domestic customers to improve their shipment volumes. Second, our rail and logistic partners have stepped up and helped us quickly divert some of our export shipments to an alternative port in Virginia where we secured some incremental capacity which has allowed us to move approximately 50% of our planned export volumes. Until the permanent 50-foot draft shipping channel is reopened in the Port of Baltimore, we expect to be operationally constrained. The good news is that we are still shipping tons into the export market, thanks to the cooperation of our rail and logistic partners, which has helped us partially mitigate the financial impact of the bridge collapse on our business. Now, let’s discuss our operational performance in detail. On the safety front, our Itmann Preparation Plant had zero employee recordable incidents during the first quarter of 2024. Our coal operations finished the quarter with a total recordable incident rate well below the national average for underground coal mines. Coal production at the Pennsylvania Mining Complex came in at 6.5 million tons in Q1 2024, compared to 7 million tons in the prior year period. Production was lower due to the previously mentioned longwall moves in Q1 2024 compared to zero moves in Q1 2023. As a result of these longwall moves, as well as ongoing inflationary pressures, our PAMC average cash cost of coal sold per ton for Q1 2024 was $40.29, compared to $33.61 in Q1 2023. Looking ahead, we expect to have only one longwall move for the remainder of the year. Moving on to Itmann. During the first quarter of 2024, sales from the complex improved to 193,000 tons of coal, including third-party tons, compared to 159,000 tons in Q4 2023. During the first quarter, all three operating sections continued to mine additional height for mains development, which requires cutting additional rock and slows mining rates. Furthermore, we continued to be impacted by equipment delivery issues with a major supplier and high employee turnover, which led to the idling of several production shifts throughout the quarter. Given the recent pullback in met coal markets, we expect that employee turnover and supply chain bottlenecks could ease if we begin to see some supply rationalization. Despite these setbacks, we expect to complete our long-term mains development during the second quarter, which will allow us to operate the mining sections at more efficient mining heights and improve production rates. Moving to the CONSOL Marine Terminal. Despite losing five days of potential vessel loadings, we achieved a throughput volume of 4.5 million tons during Q1 2024, compared to 4.6 million tons in the prior year quarter. Terminal revenues for the quarter came in at $24.5 million and CMT operating cash costs were $7.2 million. Accordingly, CMT adjusted EBITDA finished at $16.8 million, compared to $20.6 million in the prior year period. With that, let me turn the call over to Mitesh to provide the marketing and financial updates.
Mitesh Thakkar: Thank you, Jimmy, and good morning, everyone. Despite some demand softness, the power generation markets, due to mild winter weather during the first quarter, demand for our product remains strong in the export markets, specifically the industrial and crossover metallurgical markets. As such, we continue to take advantage of our high quality product and sold nearly 60% of our total volumes into the export markets during the quarter. From a revenue perspective, sales into the export market accounted for 65% of our total recurring revenue and other income. Conversely, domestic power generation sales accounted for 30%. During 1Q 2024, we sold 6.1 million tons of PAMC coal at an average coal revenue per ton sold of $68.33, compared to 6.7 million tons at $84.32 in the year ago period. We continue to see a lot of interest for our product in the export markets. This is evident in the fact that with the disruption caused by the temporary closure of the Baltimore Port, most of our customers are focused on moving and deferring current shipments instead of canceling their shipments. So, we believe the demand has been deferred, not lost. In the second half of 2024, we expect to increase the percentage of tons going into the export market compared to our projections when we began the year. Our ability to sell our PAMC product into many different end-use markets gives us significant flexibility to pivot tons between markets depending on demand strength. We began 2024 initially forecasting to sell approximately 50% of our PAMC volume into the export markets. However, due to reduced domestic demand and our ability to pivot, we now expect to move 60% or more into the stronger international markets in 2024, despite the temporary port closure in Baltimore. In fact, the port closure has limited high CV thermal exports and improved CFR India prices, along with API2 prices over the past several weeks. Specifically, we have seen Indian retail inventories tighten due to these reduced high CV exports from the U.S., and with the monsoon season about to begin, we expect these inventories to remain low when the restocking season kicks off. This could result in strong demand and pricing once the monsoon season ends. On the crossover metallurgical front, we sold 508,000 tons of our PAMC product into this market during 1Q 2024 and continue to focus on penetrating new markets. Currently, we are seeing renewed interest for our crossover product, particularly in Southeast Asia, where demand is picking up. On the domestic front, despite the near-term coal demand weakness due to mild weather, there are long-term indicators for potential growth in domestic coal-fired generation demand. The biggest driver for this demand in the U.S. is the expected growth in artificial intelligence on top of the already growing power demand for electric vehicles, heat pumps and the manufacturing of microchips, EVs and batteries. The Wall Street Journal reports that AI servers could consume 6% of total U.S. electricity generation by 2026, up from 4% in 2022. The Journal also points out that a recent scientific study estimates that AI servers worldwide could consume as much power as a mid-sized economy like Sweden or the Philippines as early as 2027. Domestically, it has been reported that Samsung (KS:005930) will double its semiconductor investments in Texas to $44 billion. Furthermore, a Southeastern domestic utility has recently made the decision to build new power plants in order to serve the increased demand from new data center load. This new data center load will be serviced exclusively by natural gas, coal and a small amount of batteries. The same utility has also delayed the retirement of some of its coal-fired power plants in order to service this increased demand. Consistent with these domestic demand trends, we recently completed a fixed-price three-year term deal in the domestic market for 950,000 tons running from 2026 through 2028. We are also currently in negotiations with another domestic utility for a long-term fixed-price deal. Now let me provide a quick update on our financial results before moving on to our 2024 guidance and outlook. This morning, we reported a strong first quarter 2024 financial performance. We generated net income of $102 million or $3.39 per dilutive share and adjusted a bid of $182 million. During the quarter, we spent $42 million in CapEx, which resulted in approximately $41 million of free cash flow. We also deployed $58 million to our share buybacks and reduced outstanding debt by $4 million. Our free cash flow was impacted negatively by approximately $81 million of working capital changes. Let me highlight a few items that resulted in this negative working capital impact. First, the timing of longwall moves in February and early March impaired our receivables collection during the quarter. Second, the closure of the Baltimore Port resulted in our inability to ship approximately 450,000 tons of coal at the end of the quarter, which is now sitting in inventory. Despite these issues, we ended the quarter with a net cash position of $65 million and total liquidity of $478 million. We continued to maintain strong liquidity of $502 million at the end of April as well. A prudent capital allocation over the last few years, which prioritized debt repayment and bolstering liquidity, has significantly improved our ability to manage through a multi-month restriction on moving our export volumes. Since our spinoff, we have increased our unrestricted cash and short-term investments by more than $100 million and reduced our annual debt servicing cost by more than $60 million. In other words, we have significantly reduced the fixed cost in the business while simultaneously improving our liquidity and financial flexibility, which gives us comfort in managing through the terminal disruption. Before moving on to guidance, let me provide some perspective around the impact of the Baltimore Port closure and how it will drive our outlook for 2024. As Jimmy mentioned, we are restricted in our ability to export coal. In working with our customers and logistics partners, we are currently able to move approximately 600,000 export tons per month to 800,000 export tons per month from an alternate port compared to a typical 1.2 tons per month to 1.5 million tons per month of our PMC product to Baltimore. We expect this situation to continue through the end of May. Assuming there are no restrictions at the Baltimore Port beginning in June, we will work to not only resume our historical average throughput rate, but to potentially make up for the lost throughput tonnage from April and May. Accordingly, we are adjusting our production guidance to reflect that assumption. Starting with the PMC, due to the bridge collapse, we are reducing our 2024 sales volume to a range of 24 million tons to 26 million tons from the previous range of 25 million tons to 27 million tons. Our PMC mines were running very well until the bridge collapse and continue to run well on their current reduced schedules. Our marketing team has also done a good job to quickly secure spare port capacity. In preparation for the port reopening, the CMT team has focused these past few weeks on completing their planned shutdown projects while we ship PMC tons to stockpile at the terminal. Our plan is for the CMT to then reduce the duration of its typical shutdown period and ship coal from the stockpile while the mines and railroads go through their summer maintenance shutdowns. On the pricing front, we are maintaining our average coal revenue per ton sold range of $62.50 to $66.50. Holding this range, despite the increased shipping costs of the export tons that pivoted to a Virginia port, reflects the improved API2 benchmark pricing compared to earlier this year when the guidance range was initially set. Given the reduced tonnage range and lower fixed cost distribution benefit in April and May, we are increasing our PMC average cash cost of coal sold guidance to $37.50 per ton to $39.50 per ton, an increase of $1 per ton on each end of the range. For our Itmann Mining Complex, we are increasing our sales volume guidance to a range of 700 tons to 900,000 tons and from the previous range of 600 tons to 800,000 tons. On the cash cost front, we are suspending our average cash cost of coal sold per ton guidance at the Itmann Mining Complex due to the continued significant equipment delivery delays, reduced manpower and the evolving mix of mined, purchased and processed coal at the complex. Lastly, on the capital expenditures front, in an effort to partially mitigate the effects of the bridge collapse, we are reducing our CapEx guidance range by approximately $20 million to a range of $155 million to $180 million, from the previous range of $175 million to $200 million. With that, let me turn it back to Jimmy.
Jimmy Brock: Thank you, Mitesh. Let me now provide an update on our shareholder return to progress. We deployed approximately 89% of the free cash flow generated during the first quarter towards repurchasing shares of our outstanding common stock. In total, through April 2024, we deployed $37 million of our Q1 2024 free cash flow towards repurchasing 440,000 shares of CEIX common stock at a weighted average price of approximately $84 per share. Since restarting our share repurchase program in late 2022, we’ve retired 6.1 million shares or approximately 18% of our public flow. As we have mentioned, we remain dedicated to returning value to our shareholders through our capital allocation framework. We continue to believe that demand for our high quality coal in the export industrial markets will be stronger for much longer than we’re given credit for. We also believe that our long-term contracts provide us with strong revenue visibility. As such, we continue to believe that share buybacks are the best use of our capital. As always, we will continue to analyze this and prioritize the highest rate return. Moving forward through the remainder of 2024, our major focus will be on mitigating as much of the reduced export tonnage due to the bridge collapse as possible. Customer demand in the export markets has remained strong and we have had constant communication with our customers to work through the delays and move shipments around. We continue to work closely with the Coast Guard and local authorities to open the shipping lane as soon as possible. As Mitesh mentioned, we have a plan to accelerate our summer maintenance work at the CMT in conjunction with pre-shipping coal to the terminal to allow it to hit the ground running when the shipping lane opens. This will also allow the CMT to continue shipping throughout the shutdown period when the railroads and mines will close for maintenance work. Before turning over the call, I want to thank our employees for their timely reaction to the accident in Baltimore. The CMT team jumped into action working with local authorities and developing plans to accelerate maintenance. Our mining operations quickly pivoted to maximize efficiency and optimize their operating schedules. Our marketing team leveraged the strong relationships we built with our transportation partners to secure some incremental capacity at an alternative export facility, as well as reroute trains to this port. Finally, the entire team across the Board has been focused on managing as much spend as possible to help partially mitigate the financial impact until the Port of Baltimore is reopened. It is our team’s dedication and hard work that allow us to so quickly manage through these unforeseen challenges that inevitably happen in this business. With that, I will hand the call back over to Nate for further instructions.
Nathan Tucker: Thank you, Jimmy. We will now move to the Q&A session of our call. At this time, I’d like to ask our Operator to please provide the instructions to our callers. Operator, could you please provide the instructions?
Operator: Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Lucas Pipes of B. Riley Securities. Your line is now open. Please ask your question.
Lucas Pipes: Thank you very much. Good morning, everyone. Good job managing Q1 and also the impact of the tragedy. My first question is on the Q2 outlook. Mitesh, you mentioned a few moving pieces, cash and liquidity balances in April. I haven’t had the time to do the math on what this means for your cash flow here, but maybe you could walk us through various moving pieces, both from a P&L perspective, volume perspective, cash flow perspective in Q2 and then also sort of the major of the year? Thank you.
Jimmy Brock: Lucas, let me start out with the volume. So if you look at where we currently sit, we moved about 1.4 million tons in the month of April. So if you assume close to the same in May and then some of the unknowns, if the port opens up earlier, you’re obviously given an opportunity to move more or if it’s later, less. But just assume we hit the end of May and then we’re on track for May. My estimate for volume and talking to the teams here daily is we should approach somewhere approximately near 5 million tons, providing the Port of Baltimore does reopen at the end of May.
Mitesh Thakkar: Yeah. And Lucas, just on the cash flow perspective, we gave you some numbers to think about from a liquidity perspective. I think for the month of April, we generated about $20 million of free cash flow. Now, that does not include the inventory at the Port of Baltimore is still there. We expect May to be a little bit lighter, but we are optimistic that we should be in a position to generate free cash flow, assuming the port opens in time. But a lot of moving parts on if there are any restrictions at the opening and those kind of things. So it’s hard for me to give you exact guidance on Q2, but that’s how I would think about it. We went into May with a little bit of a free cash flow generation in April. May might be a little bit lighter. June should recover.
Lucas Pipes: Got it. Thank you. And just a quick follow up. So on the 5 million tons of volumes or so, does this assume a kind of really quick restart at Baltimore? So shipping channel opens, you’re more or less back to normal or does it assume kind of a gradual ramp into June as the port operations kind of gear up and normalize?
Jimmy Brock: Lucas, one of the things that we’re taking advantage of while we have the port idle here is moving forward some of the maintenance things that we were planning on doing in the shutdown. So we’ll have that terminal ready to go on June 1. And as Mitesh mentioned, we have about 450,000 tons of inventory there that’s ready to go. So if Bobby has our customers lined up in the shipment, I think we can start right out of the gate on June 1, moving everything that we plan. Now what we don’t know, the unknown there is, what will happen and how will we be allowed to enter and exit the port. Will it be new safety restrictions? That we don’t know. But we expect to ship normal in June out of the port.
Mitesh Thakkar: And everything that we have learned so far from the authorities as well, it seems to be like normal shipment will resume 1st of June is what our thought process is. And remember, we don’t have to, we are not constantly accessing the channel. It’s once the vessel pulls in for next, let’s call it 30 hours to 40 hours, we are dumping coal in it and then it leaves. So it’s not a constant access for us. That’s something to think about as well.
Lucas Pipes: Very helpful. Thank you all for that detail. For my second question, I want to touch on your contract book and pricing in 2024 and 2025. Would you be able to provide a breakdown between your fixed and kind of variable pricing volume commitments, rather? Again, 2024, 2025, how much do you expect to sell domestically versus exports and what is the pricing sensitivity on the tons that are not fully priced here on a fixed basis? Thank you very much.
Bob Braithwaite: Good morning, Lucas. I’ll give you the full breakdown for 2024. We have about 2.3 that’s index linked to power. Exports of 11.5 sitting here today, of which about 6.9 are linked to the indices, mainly API2. We have small amount for pet coke and then obviously our high ball be crossover index linked deals as well and then about 9.1 are domestic and fixed price. I would tell you the balance of tons we have left to sell. I would anticipate going into the export markets. We did just over 500,000 tons of crossover in Q1. Q2 will be a little lighter, mainly, again, because of the channel issue. But I would expect to get back on that progress for Q3 and Q4. So sitting here today, we’re looking at pricing, call it, mid-60s and we’re basing that off of $110 API2 price for the April through December period. And based on what we have left to ship, the current sensitivity for every dollar changes about $0.12 per ton across the entire portfolio. Then when you move on to 2025, as you notice, we increased our book by about 500,000 tons since last quarter. All that is now was sold into the export market. So we now have 2.5 linked to power, 5.9 is domestic and fixed, and 5.1 is export and all of it is tied to indices. All has floors and ceilings associated with those as well. If you assume a 26 million production rate for 2025, which is typically been our midpoint, the current sensitivity there would be $0.14 for every dollar change in API2 and we’re basing that off of $100 API2 price in 2025. With that said, with the volume we have 13.5 million, our average pricing sitting here today is in the mid-60s.
Lucas Pipes: Thank you. Thank you very much for that thought. The sensitivity of $0.14 for next year. Does that make assumptions around where the remaining uncommitted volumes are going?
Bob Braithwaite: It does not. So right now that’s just based on the 5.1 million tons that we currently have under contract and then assuming the balance would be sold under a fixed price arrangement, whether it be export or domestic. And again, based on a 26-million-ton midpoint range.
Lucas Pipes: Got it. But if I were to assume, for example, that you double your exports under similar pricing arrangements, then would it be fair to assume I can double that sensitivity to API2 as well?
Bob Braithwaite: Correct.
Lucas Pipes: Okay. That’s very helpful. Really appreciate all the color. Best of luck with the port reopening and keep up the good work.
Jimmy Brock: Thank you.
Bob Braithwaite: Thank you, Lucas.
Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Nathan Martin from The Benchmark Company. Your line is now open. Please ask your question.
Nathan Martin: Thanks, Operator. Good morning, guys, and great job in the quarter.
Jimmy Brock: Good morning. Thank you.
Nathan Martin: Let’s talk about price first, price per ton in the first quarter above full year guidance. Maybe can you talk about some of the drivers there? What led to that result?
Bob Braithwaite: Yeah. Nate, I mean, a couple of things, and when we had a pretty strong January as it relates to our net back contracts, that certainly had boosted the pricing in Q1. API2 is slightly higher than what we had in our original forecast and then the balance would be just the mix of the volumes. We end up selling a little bit more into the crossover market than what we had originally projected. And as I mentioned, our thought going forward in Q3 and Q4 is we’ll continue on that pace. If you think about where our pricing guidance, we have not changed that. One thing I think is important to note is the volumes we’re moving down through Norfolk today are costing us roughly about $10 more per ton. So the fact that we’re moving all this volume through Norfolk incurring the additional costs and still maintaining our guidance range gives us a lot of confidence going forward on the tons that we have left to sell the crossover markets as they are today and also where the API2 prices.
Nathan Martin: And Bob, you kind of touched on what was going to be my next question. So, it sounds like, again, reiterated full year price per ton guidance, despite that higher transportation cost, which I think you said was $10 a ton. So if we think about, how much price per ton would have actually increased versus prior guidance after that drag, is that a way we can look at it? Just kind of pull that $10 per ton difference out.
Bob Braithwaite: Yeah. I mean, if you think about what Mitesh mentioned, we’re moving roughly 600,000 tons a month to 800,000 tons a month through Norfolk. So call it the midpoint 1.4 million tons. $10, it’s $14 million. So we’re losing, I wouldn’t say losing, but the opportunity loss is roughly $14 million there.
Nathan Martin: Okay. Got it. Appreciate that, Bob. And maybe just a question on the cash return policy. Jimmy, you touched on this, obviously, in your prepared remarks, but you’re returning 89% of first quarter free cash flow to repurchases. I think it was 85% last quarter. Obviously, each quarter ahead of your target, which is around 75%. Is this a pace we should kind of expect you guys to continue or is this more of a case of just, I think, Jimmy, as you alluded to, returns looking better for buybacks right now versus other investments? This would be great to get your thoughts there as well.
Jimmy Brock: Yeah. I think you kind of answered your own question. But what we do is, we look at it and as we’ve said, we deploy that capital back to the highest rate of return. And today, as we look at the yields on both, it is share repurchase that that’s the highest rate of return. But that could change as far as the percentage goes. We’ve told everyone that we’re going to imply 60% or 75% of our free cash flow towards share buybacks. As we look at the quarter and we look at where we are and opportunities that we had in the market, then that number could be higher as it was this last quarter, whenever we feel like our share price is undervalued, we took an opportunity of the excess free cash flow we had and that’ll be…
Nathan Martin: Got it.
Jimmy Brock: … moving forward.
Nathan Martin: Perfect. And then maybe one final one. I hate to be maybe a little bit more on the negative side, but as we think about the Baltimore Terminal reopening, hopefully here by the end of May, if for whatever reason the schedule gets pushed out, what kind of contingencies do you guys have in place if that main channel doesn’t reopen for one week, two weeks, whatever the case may be beyond the end of May? Do you still have the alternative transportation in place going into June available to you? This would be great to get some more color there.
Bob Braithwaite: Yeah. We do, Nate. Our transportation partners really stepped up during this time to really give -- to really assist us and they’re there for us as long as we need them. Obviously, it’s a better move to go from our Bailey Mine to Baltimore versus down to Norfolk. But they’re here to support us. We’ve had long term partnerships with them. Obviously, the longer the Baltimore port is out, the more we’ll be constrained. But the 600,000 tons a month to 800,000 tons a month, I think, is still achievable through June should this port be -- channel reopening be delayed. But the good news, too, as we mentioned, our terminal took advantage of the time to get their outbound maintenance done. So our goal, again, would be to make up as much volume as we possibly can into the first week of July when typically, that would be our shutdown. So we’ll continue to keep the terminal stuffed and the volume is still there. We haven’t lost one vessel as we sit here today. So all -- everything has been deferred and we continue to get emails daily from our customers, asking when this port is going to reopen, because they want to get their vessels loaded ASAP. So, again, good news there and we’ll continue to utilize the Norfolk port so long as we need to.
Nathan Martin: All right. Thank you guys very much. I appreciate the info and the time. Best of luck here in the second quarter.
Bob Braithwaite: Thanks.
Jimmy Brock: Thank you, Nate.
Operator: Thank you. We don’t have any further questions at this time. Presenters, please continue. We have a follow-up question from the line of Lucas Pipes of B. Riley Securities. Your line is now open. Once again, Lucas Pipes from B. Riley Securities. Your line is now open. Please ask your question.
Lucas Pipes: Sorry about that. I was on mute. Thank you very much for taking my follow-up question. I want to ask on Itmann and if you could update us on the equipment delays, if there’s an update from the vendor when that situation is expected to improve? And then also kind of longer term, where would you expect those costs to shake out? Is the prior guidance still the best kind of yardstick or would you expect increases from there? Maybe you still see further improvements once the line is fully up and running. But we’d appreciate your thoughts on that. Thank you.
Bob Braithwaite: Yeah. So on the equipment delays, Lucas, we do have -- one thing that’s going to help us. Hopefully here by the end of June or the first week in July, we do have some two pieces of rebuilt equipment coming back to us that should help us. Those are both CM (TSX:CM) units. But we keep getting delays on our new units that are coming, which we really need, because by that time, we’re going to have the mains development complete and we can put those new machines in these gates. As far as the costs, we are -- we withdrew the guidance because we want to have more certainty around what we give and there’s two things that’s really hurting it right now. One is the equipment and the second is the labor, is the manpower. So if we get those back to where we’re not out in these sections and we have the equipment, the people that work, then I think we can get guidance. My expectation is to be within the guidance that we provided earlier and it would be very similar to what others are running in Central App. I still feel really good about the project. It’s a great quality. We just have to get labor there and equipment and it’s been a challenge for us. I mean, we’re working every day at it, we have job fairs and we are getting closer to where we want to be, but we’re not there to where we can run 100% of the time. I mean, we are -- we’ve got anywhere from 25% to 40% of our shifts out, so it’s hard to give guidance.
Mitesh Thakkar: Lucas, another variable I would add is, we are buying a lot of purchase coal as well. As you know, we built that prep plan with additional capacity, and if you look at the sales volume that we provided for the first quarter, I think, there was a fair amount of purchase volume in it, probably 40% to 45%. And so from that perspective, I would say, once we have a better view on how the purchase volume shakes out longer term as well, that will also determine that cost guidance.
Lucas Pipes: Very helpful. Thank you. And then I want to, Bob, circle back on the pricing comments from earlier. And I wondered if you could maybe specifically comment on the domestic market and how the pricing is holding up there on the backdrop of acutely weaker gas prices, curve is obviously stronger. But how are those conversations going as you look out to 2025 and maybe beyond? What’s the appetite to procure tons and how would those prices compare to the netbacks you could realize in the export market? Thank you for that perspective.
Bob Braithwaite: Yeah. I mean, there certainly was a lack of winter for sure this year again. And most of our customers are well stocked heading into the shorter months that we’re experiencing now. But I will tell you that, hearing from many, they are expecting a strong summer burn and that should translate into some strong demand in the third quarter. I will tell you, as Mr. Mitesh mentioned, we did secure 950,000 tons into the domestic market. That volume was for 2026 through 2028. The pricing we secured there was pretty much in line with what the published marks are today and we’re also in negotiations for some additional volumes beginning in 2025 through 2028. So when you look at the gas forward curve, which is what we do and I think a lot of our customers do as well, you could kind of back calculate what a reasonable, I’ll say, mine price is, which the forward curve I think is pretty spot on as it sits there today.
Lucas Pipes: Thank you. Thank you very much. A higher level question to end from my side. The recent final rule on the Clean Power Plan, what do you think this means for U.S. coal generation if it were to hold up in court? And how do you kind of square that with what you’re seeing on the demand side from data centers and such? I would appreciate your thoughts on that. Thank you.
Jimmy Brock: Well, the first one that has the greatest amount of concern is the clean power for the -- Clean Power 2.0 or Carbon Rule. Obviously, they have deadlines out there and it’s -- you can either decide you’re going to retire the coal-fired plant and run longer or you can make the upgrades with the carbon capture and be allowed to run to a longer period. So to me, Lucas, the big thing is about where are we going to get the power needed if the rule goes in as is. My expectation is there’ll be a lot of litigation. I know it’s already been talked about among trade associations and others, but the American people that are listening should be really worried about this, because we are headed for a grid collision. I mean, power demand is moving in the exact opposite way and then we’re forcing these coal-fired plants to retire at an accelerated rate if this Clean Power Plan goes through as the regulations have stated on April 24th. So to me, it has some concern, and I think, it would be probably later in this decade before you started to see any of the direction it’s going to go. So I think we have some time, but the way the rules are out today, it should not only be me worried, it should be all the American people about where they’re going to get their electricity from with the demand rates coming as they are.
Lucas Pipes: Jimmy, I really appreciate your perspective. Again, keep up the good work and best of luck.
Jimmy Brock: Thanks, Lucas.
Operator: We don’t have further questions at this time, presenters please continue.
Jimmy Brock: Thank you. We’d like to thank you all for your participation this morning and for your support of CONSOL Energy. We hope we answered your questions and we look forward to speaking with you on our next earnings call. Thank you.
Operator: This concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.