How Will Province Of Quebec Pay Back $10 Billion Of Debt?

 | Oct 16, 2018 14:13

With an updated financial framework in the platform , the CAQ committed to use $10 billion of the Generations Fund, which book value is expected to reach $13.3 billion by the end of FY 2018-19, to pay back Quebec’s public debt. The first thing worth highlighting is that the intention of the new government is merely a shift in the timing of the drawdown. Indeed, the previous government had already planned for a $10-billion debt reduction over the next five years, starting with $2 billion in FY 2018-19. Therefore, excluding interests on the debt, the debt reduction over a five-year horizon is the same and is unlikely to create major market disruptions or alter Quebec’s ratings profile.

The net financial benefit of this policy will depend on how the foregone realized returns on the reduced investment in the fund over the next five years will compare with the interest savings of lower borrowing requirements by the Quebec government. Since inception, the return on the investments of the fund has been higher than the marginal average cost of borrowings by the Quebec government. However, now that benchmark interest rates are rising and the business cycle is aging, these excess returns might not materialize again; at least in the near future. Moreover, any leverage strategy that may bring potential financial benefits carries a cost as taxpayers are supporting the risk of such strategy. The risk premium associated to the investment in the funds are not merely excess returns, they represent the cost of the risk taken by the fund and, ultimately, the taxpayers.

Retiring existing maturities

The timetable established by the government-elect would give the Ministry of Finance about five months before March 31 to implement its debt-reduction plan. As of Oct. 1st, the government of Quebec and its subsidiaries had around $193 billion of market debt outstanding. However, it is unlikely that the government would elect to buy back issues currently trading in the secondary markets. Signalling its intent to do so could lead to an increase in the price of such securities and thus would cost the government more to buy back its debt than it would otherwise. Implementing the simpler strategy of not refinancing debt reaching maturity is more optimal in our view. Assuming that the Ministry of Finance is not altering its domestic Treasury Bill and U.S. commercial paper programs, its debt retirement options by the end of FY 2018-19 are somewhat limited. Some options are presented in Table 1 below: