Condensates: Russia’s Latest Ploy To Dodge OPEC Oil Production Quotas

 | Nov 21, 2019 05:00

Russia has a new excuse for why it can’t comply with its OPEC+ production quota—condensates. According to Reuters , condensates can be broadly defined as “any type of oil that condenses into a liquid after being freed from high-pressure wells.” Under high pressure, it exists as a gas, but when the pressure is released it takes a liquid state.

On Wednesday, Russian oil minister Alexander Novak made a case for why gas condensate should be exempted from the production quotas agreed upon under the OPEC+ Declaration of Cooperation. According to Novak, Russia has several new gas fields in the Arctic that are coming online and thus the production of gas condensate will likely expand, making it increasingly difficult to comply with the terms of the production agreement.

In other words, the world’s second largest oil producer is looking to redefine the terms of the OPEC+ production limitation deal.

Of course, absent the condensate issue, Russia has failed to meet existing production cuts. Although it was called to cut production by 230,000 bpd from its October 2018 production level of 11.42 million bpd, Russia produced 11.56 million bpd this past October.

Should gas condensates be exempted from OPEC+ production quotas, and if so what might the reaction be from other producers?

Identifying Condensates: Sliding Scale, Shifting Rules/h2

In 2014, the U.S. EIA narrowed the definition of condensate because fracking wells were producing a great deal of the substance. In the U.S., regulators distinguish between how the material is produced—whether it is processed at the well-head (lease condensate) or in natural gas processing plants (plant condensate).

Generally, the oil industry decided to identify condensate as a hydrocarbon liquid with an API of 50 degrees or higher. Condensates over 50 degrees are exempted from the OPEC+ cuts.

Russia hasn’t specified the gravity of the gas condensate from its new LNG fields, which raises suspicion that, if it knows, it is probably less than 50 degrees. If OPEC+ decides to eliminate the API distinction altogether, or even adopt a less limiting definition of condensates—or example, one that classifies condensates as hydrocarbon liquids with an API of 45 or above—Russia would not be the only country to benefit.